Transpired Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. Survive an important continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, squandering the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.
Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.
In truth, this whole painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.
For example, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth of a man the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.
Maybe eventually he might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – simply operate at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.
Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that the team's approach of play “shall be decided by this group”.
After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Who else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?
This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to join a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or leaks out of the box.
In the meantime, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him live to blunder another day.
And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss them for playing too much 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and later bin them for requiring too long. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.
A passionate gaming journalist with over a decade of experience covering industry trends and game analysis.